Dominion V.S. Dominionism

The word and underlying theology of Dominion is the cause of much controversy in charismatic streams. We have dominion as believers.

The operative question is, over what do we have dominion?

And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

Genesis 1:28

Dominion is Radah (Hebrew) – to subjugate; specifically to prevail against, reign, rule, overtake.

Dominionism is a term used to describe conservative, politically active Christians who believe that God has appointed the church to subdue and Christianize all institutions and aspects of society. The most extreme among these seek to create a Christian Theocracy. The underlying presupposition is that Jesus appointed the church to bring Heaven to Earth. Jesus will only return when this is accomplished.

Adam and Eve were given dominion over the earth until they forfeited it in Genesis 3. Jesus (the new Adam) re-assumed dominion when he ascended in Acts 1. He is now seated on the throne at the right hand of the Father where He intercedes for us. Romans 8:34 No spirit-filled, Bible believing Christian would dispute this.

The same applies to,

Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you.

Luke 10:19

Having among other things, been surrounded by headhunters in the Amazon, tread on scorpions, and killed more poisonous snakes than I can count and not been harmed, I bear witness to Luke 10:19. I also understand the application of authority in this verse is not my authority over snakes, scorpions and headhunters, but the authority over fear that would hinder my obedience to God. Even deeper is the revelation that my obedience is the proverbial electrical plug that connects me to His authority that flows through me. It is also my greatest protection. That said, He doesn’t need me to accomplish His will. If we aren’t faithful He is still faithful. The next verse adds more context that leads to a correct understanding.

Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.”

Luke 10:20

In other words, don’t be consumed with the idea of your power and authority. You are going to die eventually. Be grateful that you are going to heaven and not going to Hell. Don’t fear those that can kill the body. Fear Him who can kill the body and send you to hell. That is the true meaning of nothing shall hurt you.  The overarching context of Luke 10 is repentance, the lack thereof, and humility. Jesus’s death, resurrection, and ascension gave us the authority and power over our desire and propensity to sin. No longer do we need a priest and a bloody animal sacrifice to be forgiven. We can boldly come to the throne of Grace for help in our time of need. Hence we have dominion over sin and the temptation to sin. We exercise dominion over Satan via our power to believe and obey.

Dominionists use Luke 10:19 as proof text for their drive to assert dominion over others.

Another passage regarding authority and dominion is,

He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?”  Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” 

Mathew 16:15-20

The keys to the Kingdom are the focal point for Dominionists. Yet the context of our God given authority is Peter’s revelation of who Jesus is, not who Peter is. It is framed by Jesus’s warning to

“Watch and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”

Matthew 16:6

The leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” was the religious and political spirit. Jesus did not commission the church to overcome and sanctify the systems of the world over which Satan is god. 2 Cor 4:4 Those who believe the church is called to dominate the current world system are at best committing the error of Peter who believed that Jesus was going to destroy the Roman Empire and restore the sovereignty of Israel. It was upon this basis that Peter rebuked Jesus in Matthew 16:22. Jesus replied with

Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man.

Mathew 16:23

Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done.

Mathew 16:24-27

Jesus is referencing Daniel 7:13-14, Mathew 24:29:31, and Acts 1:11 in reference to His return. In the meantime, we are promised tribulation, persecution, and suffering over which we are to exercise our authority through perseverance, endurance, and obedience which lead to our names being written in the book of life. Romans 5:1-11, Matthew 24:13, Revelation 12:10-1and 2, Revelation 13:5-10

Our authority and dominion are exercised in the love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control that we manifest despite the worst possible circumstances rather than some imagined ability to change and Christianize our circumstances.

In addition, Dominionists take Ephesians 2:6, …and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus… as a proof text regarding the current role of the church in ruling the world. Yet the context of Ephesians 2 is salvation not authority. Paul continued his sentence and established the future orientation of the coming blessing resulting from our being seated with Jesus in verse 7.

…so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.

Ephesians 2:7

Jesus was clear regarding the venue in which His dominion and our authority reign in John 18.

Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”

John 18:36

There is a mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he outlined in Christ as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth. This includes an inheritance for which Holy Spirit is a guarantee, (down-payment) until we acquire that inheritance in full. Ephesians 1:3-14

The Presupposition

Dominionism is rooted in what is known as preterism or over-realized eschatology.  It is Kingdom Now Theology whereby the church is tasked with bringing heaven to earth in preparation for Jesus’s return. The underlying presupposition is that Mathew 24-25 took place in 70AD. We are now living in the millennial reign of Christ described in Revelation 20. This is contradictory to scripture and incoherent. We can discuss this more at length. However, in my experience, presuppositions rooted in incoherence are rarely countered with a logical scriptural argument alone. Incoherence usually requires suffering that brings the errant presuppositions into question.

Biblical dominion is predicated on a future fulfillment of the kingdom. Luke 17:20-21 Our current task is to pursue Righteousness, Joy, and Peace in the Holy Spirit. Romans 14:17  In contrast, Dominionists pursue political solutions and the sanctification of institutions as a condition for the fulfillment of the kingdom. Those with a Biblical understanding of their dominion aim for personal consecration, and sanctification as part of a bride that must become spotless. They understand that God uses circumstances to conform us to the image of His Son. Those circumstances may involve suffering. Our power and authority are exercised in our being witnesses for the gospel and discipling others despite circumstances. Dominionists aim to change circumstances. The apostles never did this. Like the apostles, we may be called to be imprisoned or killed by political and or religious systems for the gospel’s sake. The Bible does not command us to fix earthly systems for Jesus. In fact, it promises that the opposite will happen. 

Many shall purify themselves and make themselves white and be refined, but the wicked shall act wickedly. And none of the wicked shall understand, but those who are wise shall understand.

Daniel 12:10

The Bible doesn’t promise a revival that ushers in the return of Jesus. It promises a great falling away. 2 Thessalonians.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

2 Thessalonians 2:3

At the end of the day, a correct understanding of dominion places Jesus on the thrown where we bow before Him and pray,

Your will not mine be done!

It is found in the correct application of

Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths. Be not wise in your own eyes; fear the Lord, and turn away from evil.  It will be healing to your flesh and refreshment to your bones.

Proverbs 3:5-8

Dominionism places a god of our imagination on the throne as we pray, often against the will of God,

My will be done in Jesus’s name!

Dominion is God centered, Christ in me the hope of glory. Dominionism is self-centered, even narcissistic in pursuit of our best life now in Jesus’s name. Dominionists hold ideas like America will be blessed because America is good. Biblical dominion states no one is righteous, not one, only God is good. We have the authority to proclaim this. We are on a trajectory established before the foundations of the world. Ephesians 1:4 His word shall accomplish that which He purposes, and shall succeed in the thing for which He sent it. Isaiah 55:11 He will accomplish it with or without us. Our job is to consecrate ourselves to Him and be sanctified by the washing of the water of His word. I could go on.

The difference in presupposition is deceptively subtle especially when not plainly stated. Yet it is profound because dominionism produces another gospel.

But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

Galatians 1:8-9

At the very least, I hear Jesus saying of Dominionists, Get behind me, Satan! For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of man.

Maranatha

The Depths of Disobedience

For I, the Lord, do not change...

Malachi 3:6

So often I hear people speaking about the Old Testament versus the New Testament as if the two tell a story about two different Gods. The implication is that the Old Testament was hard. The New Testament is easier because of grace. Nothing could be further from the truth as evidenced by Acts 5, which begins in the context of the conclusion of Acts 4.

Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common. And with great power the apostles were giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. Thus Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field that belonged to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

Acts 4:32-37

Now the full number” means everyone obeyed the Holy Spirit. There was no confusion. No prophet needed to declare “thus saith the Lord!” because everyone was in perfect submission to Jesus through Holy Spirit. That obedience can be likened to my right and left hands obeying my head. My left hand does not need to hear from my right hand to know the will of my head. It simply does what my head says.

Enter Ananias and Saphira a proverbial right hand with a will of its own. They altered God’s (the head’s) word that the rest of the body obeyed without question.

“So what if they saved a bit of the money for themselves?” cries the voice of contemporary society.

That rationalization is the first mistake. The issue was not the amount or value of what they held back. The issue was their rebellion against God! Rebellion is not measured according to stuff. Rebellion is determined by disobedience.

Biblicaly there is no such thing as partial obedience.

The rebellion of Anaias and Saphira was the same rebellion when Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to the rock as God commanded in Numbers 20. The carnal mind might justify the action because the people got the flesh-saving water they needed. But water was not God’s primary purpose. His purpose was to show Himself Holy (Set apart). And God said to Moses,

And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them.” 

Numbers 20:12

It was the same rebellion that exposed the true heart of Saul and ended his reign over Israel in 1 Samuel 15. Saul disobeyed God and kept some of the spoils of the Amalekites then rationalized and justified his disobedience by claiming he was doing it for the Lord. Saul was not concerned with pleasing the Lord or he would have obeyed.

Saul was concerned with promoting Saul. 

And Samuel said,
“Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
    as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry.
Because you have rejected the word of the Lord,
he has also rejected you from being king.”

1 Samuel 15:22-23

God cut Ananias and Saphira off for disobeying His word and so that others would fear (phóbosterror) lest the rest of His body be infected with their witchcraft and idolatry.

And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.

Mathew 5:30

The Root of Disobedience

Most theologians hold that the Fall from grace began with Satan’s question,

Did God really say…

Genesis 3:1

Eve was beguiled by Satan and ate the fruit. Then Adam relinquished his position as the head of his wife and was led into sin by Eve.

In his book Spiritual Authority, Watchman Nee points out that Eve’s rebellion began with her reply.

And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’”

Genesis 3:2

But God had said,

And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

Genesis 2:16-17

Eve added the words, “neither shall you touch it…”

Once again, contemporary reason declares,

“Oh my gosh, Brian. That’s so religious! Why are you splitting hairs? Get a grip, you Pharisee!”

Watchman Nee says reason is the problem. Reason is the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil whereby people do what is right in their own eyes in Jesus’s name.

We are not commanded to justify, rationalize, minimize, and generalize, a.k.a. reason our thoughts and actions, then sprinkle Jesus on it all. We are commanded to obey. Saying that God said something He didn’t or changing the words He said is rebellion of the first degree. This is why Paul so strongly emphasizes this warning in Galatians.

But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed
As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, 
let him be accursed.

Galatians 1:8-9

This is why I shudder when I hear the nonchalant propagation of false prophetic words and or eisigeis in place of exegesis. “Oh, they are just learning to hear,” we minimize, never once considering the wreckage that is left in the wake. It’s as if the God of all creation has become some namby-pamby daddy who doesn’t take himself seriously, so why should we?

Exegesis means “to lead out of.” That means that the interpreter is led to his conclusions by following the text.

Eisegesis means “to lead into,” which means the interpreter injects his own ideas into the text, making it mean whatever he wants.

Got Questions

False Teaching

Paul covers the subject of false teachers and teachings extensively in 2 Timothy. He praises Timothy for having

Carefully followed my doctrine…

2 Timothy 3:10

Correct doctrine is correct teaching concerning the word of God apart from which obedience is impossible. Correct teaching is always exegetical not eisegetical.

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

2 Timothy 2:15

We must divide what is there, not what we imagine is there. We divide Truth from untruth. Paul gives an example.

But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;
Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

2 Timothy 2:16-18

Hymenaeus and Philetus engaged in profane and vain babblings via their eschatological claim that the future bodily resurrection promised in Mathew 24:29-30 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 had already taken place. The Sadducees taught that there is no bodily resurrection at all. Keep in mind, the context of this chapter is false teaching. Paul’s point was not to enter into a debate about eschatology. Rather he was illustrating the seriousness of false teachings that produce ungodliness to the point of falling away from the faith.  Godliness is eusébeia (Greek) – holiness. False teachings make one unholy regardless of how sweet they sound.

But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus

2 Timothy 2:14- 15

Paul concludes 2 Timothy 3 with a foundational presupposition in our Acts 17:11 Bereans Bible study.

All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

2 Timothy 3:16-17

There are many important things in our walk with God. Yet nothing is more important than the ability to rightly divide the word of truth. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth who leads us into all truth. He brings scriptural truth to remembrance. John 14:17 If the spirit within us speaks contrary to the word of God, then that Spirit is not Holy Spirit. At best, it is our soul, namely our mind, will, emotions, and the stories we create to make sense of our experiences. At worst, it is a spirit of antichrist masquerading as an angel of light. One thing is certain. God’s voice will never contradict His word.

Period!

Except for the Book of Philemon, there are warnings against false teachers and false teachings in every book of the New Testament. That should tell us something. No wonder James warns that,

Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.

James 3:1

If I say or write something wrong and you love me then you will correct me. If you can show me I am wrong I will thank you and I will repent. 1 John 1:9 I don’t much care about the tone you use, provided the correction is true, and rooted in scripture. I learn by being corrected by Holy Spirit and by my Holy Spirit-filled brothers and sisters.

Why then do so many minimize and even sanction the falsification of God’s word?

preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. But as for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

2 Timothy 4:2-5

So often I hear people defend their preferred teacher or preacher based on their kindness, compassion, and caring approach toward their flock. Some well-meaning followers become enamored with a personality or a person’s charisma and mistake it for anointing. Anointed is ChristChristos, in Greek, and means one with the authority to speak on God’s behalf. Jesus warned of many false Christos in the end times. Many times sincere and honest seekers can’t fathom that someone so influential in the body of Christ could be so wrong or worse, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Others succumb to confirmation bias. They hear what they want to hear because it makes sense according to their experience and or what they have been taught. Or it suits their own passions and they simply disregard anything that opposes their point of view. Passion does not always imply blatant sins of the flesh. Passion could simply be

“My reasoning, my altruistic will in Jesus’ name”.

What we often end up with today is that people embrace the heresy and rebuke anyone who calls out the heresy. No one considers the seriousness of Anaias and Saphira in the context of

The God who does not change.

At the end of the day and the current age, it doesn’t make a lick of difference in how sweet, joyful, gentle, kind, gifted, intelligent, loving, etc. someone appears if they are twisting God’s words or proclaiming what God never said. Hence, in 1 Corinthians 4 Paul exhorts us to

Not go beyond what is written.

The KJV says,
not to think of men above that which is written.

1 Corinthians 4:6

This was a huge problem in the church of Corinth. It is a huge problem in the church today.

When we study and endeavor to rightly divide the word of Truth, we need to be certain we are reading what was actually said at the time it was written. We need to understand the cultural and literary context. We need to know something about the audience to whom the message was given. We need to be sure our Bible translation accurately reflects the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek lest we produce a doctrine out of our own eisegesis. That’s how all cults begin. We need to follow the tradition of the Acts 17:11 Bereans and search the scriptures to see if what a given teacher or Bible translation says is true. Those who insist on an eisegetical, “God told me” even though scripture contradicts it approach may find themselves in the same proverbial boat with Eve, Saul, Ananias, and Saphira.

The following example is going to ruffle some feathers.

There is a popular Bible translation within the charismatic stream that is really an eisegetical interpretation. The author makes all sorts of radical prophetic claims about himself all of which glorify himself. One of these is that God took him to heaven and revealed an added chapter 22 to the book of John. Galatians 1:8-9 aside, the ubiquitous, undeniable spiritual proposition, “God told me,” shuts down most naysayers. After all, who am I, a mere man, to argue with God? Hence, Paul’s admonition to the Church in Corinth, “Let every word be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.” Those witnesses are scriptures, not your friend’s opinion masquerading as Holy Spirit. We also have Paul’s instruction to the church in Thessaloniki  “Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.”

While I felt a check in my spirit, my initial response when I heard of the Passion Translation at Harvest School in 2016 mirrored that of Jeremiah to Hananiah in Jeremiah 28.

“Amen! May the Lord do so; may the Lord make the words that you have prophesied come true…”

Jeremiah 28:6-9

I wanted the author’s claims to be true.

In the end, the Lord rebuked Hananiah through Jeremiah.

“Listen, Hananiah, the Lord has not sent you, and you have made this people trust in a lie. Therefore thus says the Lord: ‘Behold, I will remove you from the face of the earth. This year you shall die, because you have uttered rebellion against the Lord.’”

Jeremiah 28:15-16

God killed Hananiah for speaking what He did not say.

The fact that God hasn’t killed all the fake prophets today does not mean that God has changed or His word has changed. It means there is mercy and time to repent. After all, accursed means

“Going to Hell.”

And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment

Hebrews 9:27

The Passion author Brian Simmons also claims the God ordained authority to correct all other translations. I guess that makes the Passion the only correct translation. Many in our stream subscribe to the Passion. I suspect this is because it is more poetic, gentle, and loving according to contemporary definitions of “loving”, and therefore more palatable.

I just feel like the Lord is pleased with it.

I’ll admit, the poetic license Simmons uses frequently sounds a lot sweeter than other versions. We purchased the Passion Psalms and Proverbs after Harvest School and loved them at first.

Here is one example that sparked my concern.

Ephesians 5:22-33 is foundational to all of the counseling we do with couples. We would go so far as to say that all marriage problems would be solved if couples would simply obey these verses as they are written. If you want to know more about our counseling approach, you can read Husbands  Love Your Wives.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands,
as unto the Lord.” KJV

Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. ESV

Ephesians 5:22

Simmons claims that Ephesians 5:22 should actually read, “Wives be tenderly devoted to your husband as the church is tenderly devoted to Christ.” 

Tender – showing gentleness and concern or sympathy.

-Oxford English Dictionary-

That seems nice.

Should a wife be tenderly devoted to her husband? Sure. There’s nothing wrong with tenderness. A mother should also be tenderly devoted to her children. Tender devotion is not the operative question at hand. The English word Devotion occurs twice in the New Testament ESV. For example,

But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ.

2 Corinthians 11:3

The KJV uses the word simplicity.

Simplicityhaplótēs
Singleness, sincerity, mental honesty, the virtue of one who is free from pretence and hypocrisy, not self-seeking.

-Strongs Concordance-

That’s not what Paul is commanding in Ephesians 5:22.

Simmons further claims that Ephesians should be translated from Aramaic because Jesus spoke Aramaic. But Ephesians was written Greek to people who spoke Greek.  Therefore the correct meaning of this God breathed passage is only found in Greek.

The God breathed word in Ephesians 5 says, “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

Submit in Greek is hypotássō 
“a Greek military term meaning “to arrange troops militarily under the command of a leader”. In non-military use, it was “a voluntary attitude of giving in, cooperating, assuming responsibility, and carrying a burden”.

– Strongs Concordance-

As Cathy says, tender devotion works great when things are going great. The true test of submission is when things are not going great or the wife vehemently disagrees with her husband’s decision. There have been times when Cathy disagreed with me and I was wrong. But she submitted to my final decision anyway out of obedience to the Lord. Tenderness and devotion toward me may are may not have been there in the moment. That put me in a position to be corrected by God which He eventually did. Having sailed from Hawaii to Thailand on a thirty-six-foot sailboat through a hurricane, Cathy will be the first to tell you there can be only one captain when the storm hits.

Paul isn’t giving his opinion or preferences regarding how he would like to be treated. He is declaring the God breathed word. He uses the picture of husband and wife, rightly related to one another, such that two become one flesh, to depict Christ’s relationship to His church. Marriage is unique and distinctive from all other relationships on earth. It is “a mystery” that can only be apprehended through obedience. Hence, submitt means submit. Meanwhile, the husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He gives himself up for her. He is fully prepared to die for her if necessary. When both parties are obedient to the word they submit to God before each other to form a triangle with God at the apex. The closer they grow together. The closer they grow to God and vice versa.  At the root of every marriage in crisis is the failure of one or more parties to obey the Word of God in Ephesians 5. Obedience to the word by both parties brings healing to the marriage one hundred percent of the time. By rewording this one verse Brian Simmons effectively altered God’s blueprint for marriage and God’s depiction of the mystery of two becoming one in marriage and the church.

That should strike Phobos in our hearts.

For the record, Brian Simmons seems quite likable. He seems gentle and kind, and well-meaning. He seems like the sort of person with whom most believers wouldn’t mind fellowshiping. Like so many charismatic celebrities, his gifting and charisma led many believers to dismiss the warning in Galatians 1:8-9 entirely.

“Oh, it can’t be that bad.” We say. “I mean look at him. He’s so gentle and kind and loving…”

You might disagree. But here is the problem as I see it. Sometimes we are too willing to compromise in the name of love. We compromise because we have been indoctrinated, albeit subconsciously, to believe that tolerance is love. This is largely due to our collective worldview being tainted by an educational system rooted in Postmodernism and Critical Theory instead of Biblical truth that says obedience is love.

And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.

2 John 1:6

We tolerate blatant error and even heresy rather than confront it because love has been framed as tolerance. The Bible says we cannot love until we have purified our hearts through obedience to the truth.

Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart,

1 Peter 1:22

Tolerance prioritizes people’s feelings. We don’t want to risk hurting people’s feelings so we don’t tell them the truth. We claim to care about others. In reality, we are terrified of being disliked. We say we love God. But how can we love God if we are willing to compromise His word for the sake of being liked by people?

Shielding ourselves from Truth does not protect love. It suffocates it.

-Author Unknown-

Other times we won’t confront an error because we don’t want to be confronted ourselves. We tell people they are “amazing” because we want to hear that we are amazing. The Bible says we should fear the pursuit of personal affirmation and accolades.

“Woe to you, when all people speak well of you, for so their fathers did to the false prophets.”

Luke 6:26

Therefore I exhort you.

God doesn’t change.

Do not dismiss the potential depths of disobedience.

Again, I realize that some people are not going to like, let alone agree with what I have written here. That’s fine. If I am anything, I am a watchman. Believe and do as you will. My obedience to God on this matter is complete.

But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.

Ezekiel 33:6

Maranatha

Acts 4 Highlights

And as they were speaking to the people, the priests and the captain of the temple and the Sadducees came upon them, greatly annoyed because they were teaching the people and proclaiming in Jesus the resurrection from the dead. And they arrested them and put them in custody until the next day, for it was already evening. But many of those who had heard the word believed, and the number of the men came to about five thousand.

Acts 4:1-4

Most of Acts 4:1-22 is self-explanatory. There are a couple of points worthy of elaboration if only for future reference.

The Sadducees and Pharisees

The Sadducees and Pharisees were opposing religious and political parties. Here are some of the main differences that may be useful.

Sadducees Saddoukaîos,
“the righteous”
a Jewish religious party at the time of Christ, who denied that the oral law was a revelation of God to the Israelites, and who deemed the written law alone to be obligatory on the nation, as the divine authority. They also denied the following doctrines:
resurrection of the body,
immortality of the soul,
existence of spirits and angels. -divine predestination,
-They affirmed free will

-Strongs Concordance-

PhariseePharisaîos
A sect that seems to have started after the Jewish exile. In addition to Old Testament books, the Pharisees recognised in oral tradition a standard of belief and life. They sought distinction and praise by outward observance of external rites and by outward forms of piety, such as ceremonial washings, fastings, prayers, and alms giving. Comparatively negligent of genuine piety, they prided themselves on their fancied good works. They held strenuously to a belief in the existence of good and evil angels, and to the expectation of a Messiah. They cherished the hope that the dead, after a preliminary experience either of reward or of penalty in Hades, would be recalled to life by him, and be requited each according to his individual deeds. In opposition to the usurped dominion of the Herods and the rule of the Romans, they stoutly upheld the theocracy and their country’s cause, and possessed great influence with the common people. According to Josephus, they numbered more than 6000. They were bitter enemies of Jesus and his cause; and were in turn severely rebuked by him for their avarice, ambition, hollow reliance on outward works, and affection of piety to gain popularity.

– Strongs Concordance –

No Other Name

The stone that the builders rejected
    has become the cornerstone. 

Psalm 118:22

In verses 11 and 12, Peter quotes Psalm 118 and declares, “there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” This verse is also referenced in Matthew 21:42, Mark 12:10, and we might be tempted to say, “Yes I know that.” Yet Peter is declaring this to the Sadducees, several of whom, e.g. Caiaphas, had a direct hand in the crucifixion of Jesus. In fact, Peter had been lurking about and denied Jesus at the same time that Caiaphas spat in Jesus’s face. Mat 26:57-75 Hence, the scene in Acts 4 is a testimony to Peter’s genuine surrender, transformation, and boldness as he had no reasonable assurance that Caiaphas would not do the same to Peter in that moment.

Whose Authority

But Peter and John answered them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.” 

Acts 4:19-20

This is the first time that Peter confronts believers with an ethical dilemma regarding authority with a question. 

Should I listen to you or to God?

Mind you, the last time Peter had challenged the same religious authority based on what he thought was obedience to God, he chopped off Malchus’s ear in the Garden of Gethsemane only to be rebuked by Jesus.  Was Peter’s question to the Sadducees now a reflection of his remaining ambivalence, or was it a masterful use of what contemporary counselors call “developing the discrepancy” in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, where any answer would confront the Sadducees with their own error? Given Peter’s previous track record and the depth of the wisdom applied, I suspect it was another example of Holy Spirit operating through Peter.

And when they bring you before the synagogues and the rulers and the authorities, do not be anxious about how you should defend yourself or what you should say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.”

Luke 12:11-12

After spending the night in jail, the Apostles go free and tell their tale to fellow believers who lift their voices together and quote the very eschatological Psalm 2. I use the term eschatological because it proclaims the first and second coming of Jesus.

They went on to declare the irrefutable omniscience and sovereignty of God.

for truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place.

Acts 4:27-28

Wait a minute! Did he say the actions of Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Gentiles, and the peoples of Israel were predestined by the hand and the plan of God?

As a matter of fact, he did.

Those who followed us in our discussion of Freewill versus Predestination in Romans 9 and the post Getting Through the Gate will note the current score is,

Calvinism 3. Arminianism 0.

Verses 32-37 are a reiteration of Kingdom economic principles from Acts 2:42-47 covered in Lawlessness Increased.

Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common. And with great power the apostles were giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. Thus Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field that belonged to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

Acts 2:32-37

Maranatha