The Depths of Disobedience

For I, the Lord, do not change...

Malachi 3:6

So often I hear people speaking about the Old Testament versus the New Testament as if the two tell a story about two different Gods. The implication is that the Old Testament was hard. The New Testament is easier because of grace. Nothing could be further from the truth as evidenced by Acts 5, which begins in the context of the conclusion of Acts 4.

Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common. And with great power the apostles were giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. Thus Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field that belonged to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

Acts 4:32-37

Now the full number” means everyone obeyed the Holy Spirit. There was no confusion. No prophet needed to declare “thus saith the Lord!” because everyone was in perfect submission to Jesus through Holy Spirit. That obedience can be likened to my right and left hands obeying my head. My left hand does not need to hear from my right hand to know the will of my head. It simply does what my head says.

Enter Ananias and Saphira a proverbial right hand with a will of its own. They altered God’s (the head’s) word that the rest of the body obeyed without question.

“So what if they saved a bit of the money for themselves?” cries the voice of contemporary society.

That rationalization is the first mistake. The issue was not the amount or value of what they held back. The issue was their rebellion against God! Rebellion is not measured according to stuff. Rebellion is determined by disobedience.

Biblicaly there is no such thing as partial obedience.

The rebellion of Anaias and Saphira was the same rebellion when Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to the rock as God commanded in Numbers 20. The carnal mind might justify the action because the people got the flesh-saving water they needed. But water was not God’s primary purpose. His purpose was to show Himself Holy (Set apart). And God said to Moses,

And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them.” 

Numbers 20:12

It was the same rebellion that exposed the true heart of Saul and ended his reign over Israel in 1 Samuel 15. Saul disobeyed God and kept some of the spoils of the Amalekites then rationalized and justified his disobedience by claiming he was doing it for the Lord. Saul was not concerned with pleasing the Lord or he would have obeyed.

Saul was concerned with promoting Saul. 

And Samuel said,
“Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
    as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry.
Because you have rejected the word of the Lord,
he has also rejected you from being king.”

1 Samuel 15:22-23

God cut Ananias and Saphira off for disobeying His word and so that others would fear (phóbosterror) lest the rest of His body be infected with their witchcraft and idolatry.

And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.

Mathew 5:30

The Root of Disobedience

Most theologians hold that the Fall from grace began with Satan’s question,

Did God really say…

Genesis 3:1

Eve was beguiled by Satan and ate the fruit. Then Adam relinquished his position as the head of his wife and was led into sin by Eve.

In his book Spiritual Authority, Watchman Nee points out that Eve’s rebellion began with her reply.

And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’”

Genesis 3:2

But God had said,

And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

Genesis 2:16-17

Eve added the words, “neither shall you touch it…”

Once again, contemporary reason declares,

“Oh my gosh, Brian. That’s so religious! Why are you splitting hairs? Get a grip, you Pharisee!”

Watchman Nee says reason is the problem. Reason is the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil whereby people do what is right in their own eyes in Jesus’s name.

We are not commanded to justify, rationalize, minimize, and generalize, a.k.a. reason our thoughts and actions, then sprinkle Jesus on it all. We are commanded to obey. Saying that God said something He didn’t or changing the words He said is rebellion of the first degree. This is why Paul so strongly emphasizes this warning in Galatians.

But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed
As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, 
let him be accursed.

Galatians 1:8-9

This is why I shudder when I hear the nonchalant propagation of false prophetic words and or eisigeis in place of exegesis. “Oh, they are just learning to hear,” we minimize, never once considering the wreckage that is left in the wake. It’s as if the God of all creation has become some namby-pamby daddy who doesn’t take himself seriously, so why should we?

Exegesis means “to lead out of.” That means that the interpreter is led to his conclusions by following the text.

Eisegesis means “to lead into,” which means the interpreter injects his own ideas into the text, making it mean whatever he wants.

Got Questions

False Teaching

Paul covers the subject of false teachers and teachings extensively in 2 Timothy. He praises Timothy for having

Carefully followed my doctrine…

2 Timothy 3:10

Correct doctrine is correct teaching concerning the word of God apart from which obedience is impossible. Correct teaching is always exegetical not eisegetical.

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

2 Timothy 2:15

We must divide what is there, not what we imagine is there. We divide Truth from untruth. Paul gives an example.

But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;
Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

2 Timothy 2:16-18

Hymenaeus and Philetus engaged in profane and vain babblings via their eschatological claim that the future bodily resurrection promised in Mathew 24:29-30 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 had already taken place. The Sadducees taught that there is no bodily resurrection at all. Keep in mind, the context of this chapter is false teaching. Paul’s point was not to enter into a debate about eschatology. Rather he was illustrating the seriousness of false teachings that produce ungodliness to the point of falling away from the faith.  Godliness is eusébeia (Greek) – holiness. False teachings make one unholy regardless of how sweet they sound.

But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus

2 Timothy 2:14- 15

Paul concludes 2 Timothy 3 with a foundational presupposition in our Acts 17:11 Bereans Bible study.

All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

2 Timothy 3:16-17

There are many important things in our walk with God. Yet nothing is more important than the ability to rightly divide the word of truth. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth who leads us into all truth. He brings scriptural truth to remembrance. John 14:17 If the spirit within us speaks contrary to the word of God, then that Spirit is not Holy Spirit. At best, it is our soul, namely our mind, will, emotions, and the stories we create to make sense of our experiences. At worst, it is a spirit of antichrist masquerading as an angel of light. One thing is certain. God’s voice will never contradict His word.

Period!

Except for the Book of Philemon, there are warnings against false teachers and false teachings in every book of the New Testament. That should tell us something. No wonder James warns that,

Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.

James 3:1

If I say or write something wrong and you love me then you will correct me. If you can show me I am wrong I will thank you and I will repent. 1 John 1:9 I don’t much care about the tone you use, provided the correction is true, and rooted in scripture. I learn by being corrected by Holy Spirit and by my Holy Spirit-filled brothers and sisters.

Why then do so many minimize and even sanction the falsification of God’s word?

preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. But as for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

2 Timothy 4:2-5

So often I hear people defend their preferred teacher or preacher based on their kindness, compassion, and caring approach toward their flock. Some well-meaning followers become enamored with a personality or a person’s charisma and mistake it for anointing. Anointed is ChristChristos, in Greek, and means one with the authority to speak on God’s behalf. Jesus warned of many false Christos in the end times. Many times sincere and honest seekers can’t fathom that someone so influential in the body of Christ could be so wrong or worse, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Others succumb to confirmation bias. They hear what they want to hear because it makes sense according to their experience and or what they have been taught. Or it suits their own passions and they simply disregard anything that opposes their point of view. Passion does not always imply blatant sins of the flesh. Passion could simply be

“My reasoning, my altruistic will in Jesus’ name”.

What we often end up with today is that people embrace the heresy and rebuke anyone who calls out the heresy. No one considers the seriousness of Anaias and Saphira in the context of

The God who does not change.

At the end of the day and the current age, it doesn’t make a lick of difference in how sweet, joyful, gentle, kind, gifted, intelligent, loving, etc. someone appears if they are twisting God’s words or proclaiming what God never said. Hence, in 1 Corinthians 4 Paul exhorts us to

Not go beyond what is written.

The KJV says,
not to think of men above that which is written.

1 Corinthians 4:6

This was a huge problem in the church of Corinth. It is a huge problem in the church today.

When we study and endeavor to rightly divide the word of Truth, we need to be certain we are reading what was actually said at the time it was written. We need to understand the cultural and literary context. We need to know something about the audience to whom the message was given. We need to be sure our Bible translation accurately reflects the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek lest we produce a doctrine out of our own eisegesis. That’s how all cults begin. We need to follow the tradition of the Acts 17:11 Bereans and search the scriptures to see if what a given teacher or Bible translation says is true. Those who insist on an eisegetical, “God told me” even though scripture contradicts it approach may find themselves in the same proverbial boat with Eve, Saul, Ananias, and Saphira.

The following example is going to ruffle some feathers.

There is a popular Bible translation within the charismatic stream that is really an eisegetical interpretation. The author makes all sorts of radical prophetic claims about himself all of which glorify himself. One of these is that God took him to heaven and revealed an added chapter 22 to the book of John. Galatians 1:8-9 aside, the ubiquitous, undeniable spiritual proposition, “God told me,” shuts down most naysayers. After all, who am I, a mere man, to argue with God? Hence, Paul’s admonition to the Church in Corinth, “Let every word be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.” Those witnesses are scriptures, not your friend’s opinion masquerading as Holy Spirit. We also have Paul’s instruction to the church in Thessaloniki  “Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.”

While I felt a check in my spirit, my initial response when I heard of the Passion Translation at Harvest School in 2016 mirrored that of Jeremiah to Hananiah in Jeremiah 28.

“Amen! May the Lord do so; may the Lord make the words that you have prophesied come true…”

Jeremiah 28:6-9

I wanted the author’s claims to be true.

In the end, the Lord rebuked Hananiah through Jeremiah.

“Listen, Hananiah, the Lord has not sent you, and you have made this people trust in a lie. Therefore thus says the Lord: ‘Behold, I will remove you from the face of the earth. This year you shall die, because you have uttered rebellion against the Lord.’”

Jeremiah 28:15-16

God killed Hananiah for speaking what He did not say.

The fact that God hasn’t killed all the fake prophets today does not mean that God has changed or His word has changed. It means there is mercy and time to repent. After all, accursed means

“Going to Hell.”

And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment

Hebrews 9:27

The Passion author Brian Simmons also claims the God ordained authority to correct all other translations. I guess that makes the Passion the only correct translation. Many in our stream subscribe to the Passion. I suspect this is because it is more poetic, gentle, and loving according to contemporary definitions of “loving”, and therefore more palatable.

I just feel like the Lord is pleased with it.

I’ll admit, the poetic license Simmons uses frequently sounds a lot sweeter than other versions. We purchased the Passion Psalms and Proverbs after Harvest School and loved them at first.

Here is one example that sparked my concern.

Ephesians 5:22-33 is foundational to all of the counseling we do with couples. We would go so far as to say that all marriage problems would be solved if couples would simply obey these verses as they are written. If you want to know more about our counseling approach, you can read Husbands  Love Your Wives.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands,
as unto the Lord.” KJV

Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. ESV

Ephesians 5:22

Simmons claims that Ephesians 5:22 should actually read, “Wives be tenderly devoted to your husband as the church is tenderly devoted to Christ.” 

Tender – showing gentleness and concern or sympathy.

-Oxford English Dictionary-

That seems nice.

Should a wife be tenderly devoted to her husband? Sure. There’s nothing wrong with tenderness. A mother should also be tenderly devoted to her children. Tender devotion is not the operative question at hand. The English word Devotion occurs twice in the New Testament ESV. For example,

But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ.

2 Corinthians 11:3

The KJV uses the word simplicity.

Simplicityhaplótēs
Singleness, sincerity, mental honesty, the virtue of one who is free from pretence and hypocrisy, not self-seeking.

-Strongs Concordance-

That’s not what Paul is commanding in Ephesians 5:22.

Simmons further claims that Ephesians should be translated from Aramaic because Jesus spoke Aramaic. But Ephesians was written Greek to people who spoke Greek.  Therefore the correct meaning of this God breathed passage is only found in Greek.

The God breathed word in Ephesians 5 says, “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

Submit in Greek is hypotássō 
“a Greek military term meaning “to arrange troops militarily under the command of a leader”. In non-military use, it was “a voluntary attitude of giving in, cooperating, assuming responsibility, and carrying a burden”.

– Strongs Concordance-

As Cathy says, tender devotion works great when things are going great. The true test of submission is when things are not going great or the wife vehemently disagrees with her husband’s decision. There have been times when Cathy disagreed with me and I was wrong. But she submitted to my final decision anyway out of obedience to the Lord. Tenderness and devotion toward me may are may not have been there in the moment. That put me in a position to be corrected by God which He eventually did. Having sailed from Hawaii to Thailand on a thirty-six-foot sailboat through a hurricane, Cathy will be the first to tell you there can be only one captain when the storm hits.

Paul isn’t giving his opinion or preferences regarding how he would like to be treated. He is declaring the God breathed word. He uses the picture of husband and wife, rightly related to one another, such that two become one flesh, to depict Christ’s relationship to His church. Marriage is unique and distinctive from all other relationships on earth. It is “a mystery” that can only be apprehended through obedience. Hence, submitt means submit. Meanwhile, the husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He gives himself up for her. He is fully prepared to die for her if necessary. When both parties are obedient to the word they submit to God before each other to form a triangle with God at the apex. The closer they grow together. The closer they grow to God and vice versa.  At the root of every marriage in crisis is the failure of one or more parties to obey the Word of God in Ephesians 5. Obedience to the word by both parties brings healing to the marriage one hundred percent of the time. By rewording this one verse Brian Simmons effectively altered God’s blueprint for marriage and God’s depiction of the mystery of two becoming one in marriage and the church.

That should strike Phobos in our hearts.

For the record, Brian Simmons seems quite likable. He seems gentle and kind, and well-meaning. He seems like the sort of person with whom most believers wouldn’t mind fellowshiping. Like so many charismatic celebrities, his gifting and charisma led many believers to dismiss the warning in Galatians 1:8-9 entirely.

“Oh, it can’t be that bad.” We say. “I mean look at him. He’s so gentle and kind and loving…”

You might disagree. But here is the problem as I see it. Sometimes we are too willing to compromise in the name of love. We compromise because we have been indoctrinated, albeit subconsciously, to believe that tolerance is love. This is largely due to our collective worldview being tainted by an educational system rooted in Postmodernism and Critical Theory instead of Biblical truth that says obedience is love.

And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.

2 John 1:6

We tolerate blatant error and even heresy rather than confront it because love has been framed as tolerance. The Bible says we cannot love until we have purified our hearts through obedience to the truth.

Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart,

1 Peter 1:22

Tolerance prioritizes people’s feelings. We don’t want to risk hurting people’s feelings so we don’t tell them the truth. We claim to care about others. In reality, we are terrified of being disliked. We say we love God. But how can we love God if we are willing to compromise His word for the sake of being liked by people?

Shielding ourselves from Truth does not protect love. It suffocates it.

-Author Unknown-

Other times we won’t confront an error because we don’t want to be confronted ourselves. We tell people they are “amazing” because we want to hear that we are amazing. The Bible says we should fear the pursuit of personal affirmation and accolades.

“Woe to you, when all people speak well of you, for so their fathers did to the false prophets.”

Luke 6:26

Therefore I exhort you.

God doesn’t change.

Do not dismiss the potential depths of disobedience.

Again, I realize that some people are not going to like, let alone agree with what I have written here. That’s fine. If I am anything, I am a watchman. Believe and do as you will. My obedience to God on this matter is complete.

But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.

Ezekiel 33:6

Maranatha

Without Excuse

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Rom 1:18-20

Before we delve into why they are without excuse for their disbelief, we need to review how we establish proof of anything. For believers, this means identifying the reasons (arguments) for the hope that is within us. 1 Peter 3:15 Fair enough. Yet it also involves identifying the logical fallacies driving arguments that oppose God. Charismatics tend to cringe at the idea.  “Listen!” They say. “I already know that I know so who cares?!” While some believers are repelled by intellectual arguments, the fact that these arguments exist at all is in itself proof of God’s existence.

World View

While you may not have given it much thought, everyone has a worldview. It is a paradigm – a conceptual model of reality. This includes but is not limited to ideas about God, and the origins of life. Every worldview can be reduced to one or more empirically unprovable presuppositions. That the phone I am holding will fall to the ground if I let go is an empirically provable presupposition. In contrast, “God exists.” Or “God does not exist.are empirically unprovable presuppositions. Hence both are statements of faith. The question that follows any two opposing statements of faith is,

Which of them has the most logical supporting evidence?

Some might view this as splitting hairs. However, millions of young people are being argued out of their faith by falsehoods framed as proven facts.

Please don’t misunderstand. I am not rejecting alternative forms of knowledge. Spiritual discernment, prophecy, revelation, dreams, visions, or any other supernatural encounter with God and His truth can be equally valid. Rather I am establishing what Paul means by

they are without excuse

God is the author of the laws of logic, mathematics, and science that govern His creation. It was the revelation that It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honor of kings is to search out a matter Prov 25:2 that drove mankind to discover science which means knowledge in the first place.

Presuppositionalism

If you are a 2 Tim 3:16-17 Bible-believing follower of  Christ then you are by definition a presuppositionalist.  The presupposition is that All scripture is God-breathed and therefore inerrant. Can we prove this empirically? No. Or at least not yet. We are being intellectually honest when we admit that we walk by faith, not by sight. 2 Cor 5:7

In contrast, Atheists normally claim intellectual superiority over those who walk by faith. Perhaps the most famous of these is Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. When asked how atheists should respond to Christians he said, “Mock them!” Because “religion “subverts science and saps the intellect”.

Ironically, he calls himself a “cultural Christian” today. 🤔

Having listened to Dawkins for years I think this is hilarious. However, the most pertinent point to grasp is that ALL purely intellectual atheists are intellectually dishonest. Richard Dawkins is the perfect example in that he would never admit that his firmly held “there is no God” presupposition is in fact, a statement of faith. Even more important is that the above video illustrates the sleight of hand that so many atheists use in debating theists. Instead of making an argument for what they do believe, atheists redefine terms and argue for what they don’t. Here Dawkins arrogantly assumes the right to redefine the term Christian. Yet, only God and His word can define a follower of Christ.

Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. Mark 16:16

This narcissistic, self-aggrandizing nitwit has led countless students away from God. He is a quintessential representation of the spirit of anti-Christ. He actually believes that

he can claim to be Christian without believing in Christ.

If that sounds mean, consider this. I call Dawkins a nitwit because what Islamic extremists would do to him here on earth is nothing compared to what he will face in eternity if he doesn’t repent and believe.

Proof

Just as only God can define God. Only empirically proven facts can define empirical truth. Everything else amounts to faith in a presupposition.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Heb 11:1.

The good news is that genuine faith is backed by evidence such that it becomes evidence itself. The more evidence we gather, the stronger our faith and hope grow. People like Richard Dawkins listen to my subjective personal testimony then mock me and say I am nuts. But subjective does not mean untrue. As believers, we tend to confirm our subjective experiences by correlating them with similar experiences reported by others. That’s great if our faith increases. If frustration and confusion arise it is probably because we are treating subjective truth as if it were objective. Correlation is never proof of cause in itself.  Hence, an atheist might simply say it is expected that we would align with, and build consensus with other mentally ill people. Can Holy Spirit confirm our subjective truth claims in the hearts and minds of unbelievers? Certainly. Yet we must understand. The fact that someone debates our subjective truth is not what Paul said will leave them without excuse. 

We need to understand and acknowledge this if we claim to love unbelievers.

Those without excuse namely vehement atheists almost always validate their presupposition by using the subjective nature of our experiences against us. First, they point out the subjective nature of spiritual experience itself. We present what we think is supporting evidence but is really just more subjective truth. Then they claim we are delusional. If we take the bait, they trick us into arguing that we are not. The harder we try, the more frustrated we become. At that point, the atheist mocks us. We step into guilt, shame, and condemnation because we feel stupid. Or we get offended and warn them they are going to hell. We repeat the experience a few times until we give up and stop talking about God to strangers. If only we would grasp and understand that we plant and water. 1 Cor 3:5-9 That is all.  The best we can hope is that our subjective testimony and objective evidence we are about to present will inspire others to,

Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in him. Psalm 34:8

It’s important to think deeply about what Paul means when he says, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.

He is speaking specifically about the objective proof of God. That proof has grown exponentially since Paul’s day as Daniel so aptly predicted.

Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase. Dan 12:4

Those who are without excuses are not accountable for rejecting our testimony. They are accountable for rejecting the proof that was in front of them the entire time. They are accountable for the sorcery and lies to which they cling because they love their sin and their rebellion. Those without excuse do not want God to be God. In the words of a very honest atheist Thomas Nagel,

I want atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers. It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God and, naturally, hope that I’m right in my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that.”
 

The Last Word – 1997

Thomas Nagel is a perfect example of what is in the heart of every committed atheist. These are those whom Paul says are without excuse. Any purely intellectual atheist will change their mind when faced with the objective proof of God that modern science provides. The problem is that many believers remain totally unaware of how much genuine scientific confirmation of our faith exists. 

What follows is a list of evidence for the reader to explore at their leisure. While not exhaustive, the list contains some of my favorite arguments and evidence for the truth that Holy Spirit has already confirmed in the hearts of genuine believers.

Cosmological Argument

Something can not come from nothing. Those claiming it can have yet to provide the smallest shred of supporting evidence. Hence it remains a bad presupposition – an unsupported statement of faith.

Whatever begins to exist has a cause. Once again, Newton’s Third Law of Thermodynamics which no atheist would dispute says for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Saying that things exist without a cause amounts to saying that reactions do not require a precipitating action.

The universe began to exist. No scientist anywhere would seriously postulate that the universe has always existed.  Finding and recreating the moment it began is the primary goal of the Hadron Collider known as CERN in Switzerland.

Therefore, the universe has a cause. That cause would have to be outside space and time otherwise known as creation. Because something can’t come from nothing and every reaction has a precipitating action or force outside itself that set it in motion.

At the end of the day, the Cosmological Argument is a bullet-pointed breakdown of what most people call common sense. Common sense is what Paul means by …clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. Here is another example.

Intelligent Design

Imagine you were an alien landing in a forest on Earth. Trees, plant life, and birds were all you saw as you walked for miles. Suddenly you found a wristwatch buried in the leaves. You investigate further by taking the back off and notice all the miniature circuitry, the battery that powers it, and the tiny LED display. Obviously, you conclude that the watch is an aberration, the product of a random act of nature. That sounds logical.

Right?

Of course not. Comonsense tells us that complexity always indicates design. Design requires an intelligent designer. Still, many reprobates continue to argue the point. None would dispute that if it takes 23,000 engineers and three billion lines of code to run Google, the largest repository of knowledge and information on earth, it would be dumb to dispute the existence of intelligent designers behind Google. If that is the case it is just as dumb to dispute the intelligent designer of a cell weighing less than several ten-thousandths of a gram and requiring what amounts to two billion lines of code using four amino acids, adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G) and thymine (T) to operate. 

Prayer

At this point, many might assume that prayer could only be relegated to the realm of subjective truth. While the impact of prayer on the external world remains subjective, there is some fairly solid objective evidence regarding prayer’s impact on the one who is praying.

Most will remember the geologic layers they learned about in junior high or Middle School Earth Science.

The layers allegedly proved the earth is millions of years old. The existence of coal was one major proof point. While you won’t hear about it from secular sources, coal was formed during the Mt Saint Helen’s eruption in 1980. In addition to the linked article above the YouTube channel Is Genesis History is a fantastic source for scientific evidence of the Biblical story of creation.

Fine Tuning

That the earth’s position just happened to be so perfectly fine-tuned to support life defies the laws of mathematical probability. In fact, the mathematical probability of fine-tuning being a random event is 1 times 10 to the minus sixty power. Just to add context, a mathematical impossibility begins at 10 to the minus fifty power.

In case you are confused by minus 50 – 60 powers.

To give you some perspective the odds of your being struck by lightning in the United States in your lifetime is 1.5 times 10 to the minus 4 power.

The Primordial Slime

The probability of life occurring randomly out of what Evolutionary Biologists call the primordial slime is in the same range of impossibility. John Lennox is an amazing scientific Christian apologist who has successfully debated the likes of Richard Dawkins and others on the mathematical and scientific accuracy of the Bible.

That’s a whole lot to chew on.

As believers, we know the ultimate proof that God exists is found amidst our relationship with Him and in all the mighty subjective confirmations He gives within our hearts where eternity is written. Ecc 3:11 Again, we don’t provide evidence to prove God exists. Rather we provide it so that those who have been sold a fake scientific narrative can see that the science that claims to prove the nonexistence of God is not science at all. True science beholds his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, which have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made and are awed by them. True science is worship. The evidence we present causes sincere truth seekers to question what they have been told such that they open their hearts and call out to God and He will answer. Isa 65:24  Then they can taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in him. Psalm 34:8

Those who reject God do so because they don’t want there to be a God; they don’t want the universe to be like that.” It is for this reason that they are

Without Excuse!

MARANATHA