What Time Is It?

A friend recently sent me a post from a Christian organization soliciting support in their stand against the growing popularity of Socialism and Communism in the USA—case in point: the recent election of Socialist / Shia Muslim Zohran Mamdani as New York City mayor.

Our friend wondered if she’d had her head in the sand. The answer, as I see it, is,

We all do, to a degree.

As it turns out, the growing popularity of Socialism, Communism, and Anarcho-communism is less about indoctrination via Critical Theory and Postmodernism. Rather, the current shift is more a result of failed capitalism.

Those sixty and over might recoil at the last sentence. After all, many of us were taught that capitalism and socialism are both evil, but capitalism is less evil.

Socialist systems invariably become rooted in nepotism, as wealth and power end up in the hands of a few. Yeah, I am aware that the current narrative says differently. Yes, I am aware that some people benefited in places like the Soviet Union. Some people in places like Romania today still lament the fall of the USSR. This isn’t an exclusively anti-leftist post. Rather, the same dynamics also take place in the context of capitalism.

“Yes, the rich are always getting richer, but the poor get richer too.”, the capitalists say. After all, capitalism was framed as a foundation for individual freedom. By definition, it was a meritocracy where anyone willing to work could pursue happiness.

Unfortunately, Millennials and Gen Z are not having this experience. Never mind saving up to get married, purchase a home, and start a family. Relatively speaking, those who are more than one paycheck away from becoming homeless are prospering. Hence, socialism isn’t attractive on mere philosophical grounds. Socialism is how many millennials plan to not starve to death. Interestingly, food security was the primary incentive that drove the Chinese to embrace Communism.

The problem and blessing of capitalism is that it requires constant growth. Constant growth means constant acquisition of capital. That’s great while the playing field is level.  Inevitably, a hierarchy is formed as wealth and power become so consolidated in the hands of a few that continued acquisition and growth become impossible even for the 1% apex—this is where we are today.

When push comes to shove, the most successful capitalist will shove first. Otherwise, the snake eats its own tail.

He might send an economic hitman to explain the benefits of supporting the capitalist’s causes to a given leader. If he doesn’t want to play ball, the capitalist bombs his country or kidnaps the president and takes his oil.

Historically, capitalism always begins to collapse in on itself. The ruling financial elite don’t like the taste of their own tales, so they take us to war.

World wars allow the elite to reset the global economy while maintaining their own wealth. They distract the public from the true source of its angst and focus the collective attention and energy of a given society on an external enemy. The sins of an ancient proverbial Epstein Class are buried beneath our collective grief and drama as we histrionically proclaim, “God Bless America!” and “Freedom isn’t Free!”.

Trust and purpose are reborn in a flood of media-induced dopamine as we prepare to lay our children at Molech’s feet to be consumed at the direction and command of the very people we should prosecute.    

In a desperate attempt to avoid dealing with the grief associated with the demise of our culture and lifestyles, we enshrine some leaders and bedevil others. More often than not, the church and society ignore scriptures like Acts 10:34-35 and pick a side in the emerging conflict. If an enemy doesn’t attack us, then contemporary Neros within the Epstein class will do so and then blame it on the enemy of their choice. We need a divine hero and someone to blame. 

Who cares if the categorization contradicts God’s word?

Is Jesus a capitalist or a communist?

And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.  Acts 2:44-47

Acts 2 seems to imply that Jesus would have aligned himself with the Left.

Right?

Not exactly. Jesus said, His kingdom is not of this world. (John 18:36-38). Many Christians believe they are to give 10 percent of their income to the Church (Mal 3:10). But Jesus said to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s. What part of my life and possessions belong to God?  The correct answer is all. Still, the believers in Acts 2 were responding in obedience to the Holy Spirit, not a socioeconomic political philosophy.

That a worker is worthy of his wages (Luke 10:7 and 1 Timothy 5:18) is often received in the context of capitalism. But Jesus and the disciples never once acquired capital beyond the clothing on their backs. They worked with their hands. There was no such thing as a free lunch. If you don’t work, then you don’t eat. (2 Thessalonians 3:10)

That sounds like capitalism.

Jesus cleared the temple because people were capitalizing on people’s need for God. He also said You cannot serve God and Mammon, not both.”Mammon” is the word for money, wealth, and material greed. Before Pentecost, Peter thought Jesus was going to overthrow Rome and make Israel great again. Jesus rebuked Peter for setting his eyes on the things of the world instead of the things of God.

2 Corinthians 4:4 tells us that Satan is the God of this world. The world is the world system. Worldly and Satanic are synonymous. So why are we so prone to align with political and/or economic philosophies as if they are Christian or not?

Is Communism Satanic? YES. Is capitalism Satanic? YES. Fallen man is dead in his trespasses and therefore Satanic (Ephesians 2). He is incapable of creating a system that solves his problems.

Why, then, do so many believers act as if it is their job to bring heaven to earth?  

The answer is simple. They listen to false teachers.

Of course,  all of this is foolishness to unbelievers. (1 Corinthians 1:18). This is especially true today among those who deny the depravity of man and believe in his inherent goodness. In their minds, the absence of objective truth invalidates any claim that good and evil exist. The obvious question is.

“IS THAT TRUE?”

Hence, sin does not exist; it is a social construct that has outlived its usefulness. The problems that ail society can only be solved by creating systems formed based on collective consensus. Consensus is true until consensus changes. “That’s crazy!” the right proclaims. Not really. The right does the same things.

The left tends to believe that food security, healthcare, education, and housing are human rights as described in the Bill of Rights. They are interpreted as “life and liberty.”

The right categorizes these under “the pursuit of happiness. “Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps!” they say.

Has anyone ever done that?

That’s what I mean when I say, “the right does the same things.”

The politically conservative church regurgitates capitalist conservative rhetoric. Then it spends hundreds of millions of dollars providing food security, healthcare, education, and housing to the less fortunate all over the world. They return home and demonize the left for having the same goals.

Except abortion, of course. Abortion is wrong. Killing 10  women and children in Gaza to get one terrorist isn’t abortion. It’s collateral damage.

The left tends to believe in anthropomorphic CO2-driven climate change. Those on the right are more prone to believe that geoengineering, made increasingly illegal in right-leaning states, is the problem.  Both sides accuse the other of holding conspiracy theories. Meanwhile, we are entering into what many are calling World War E.

E is for energy, a.k.a oil.

I could go on with more examples of how the god of this world created hypocrisy and pits people who want the same things, albeit for different reasons, against each other. He knows he can’t do anything directly to us. He can only convince us to do it to ourselves. Historically, he’s done a pretty good job.

It looks to me like we are about to do it again on a global scale.

I used to engage in left-versus-right debates. I no longer do and mainly listen instead. I’m pretty certain that the US is about to descend into Socialism and maybe Communism by choice. As is the case with all systems, it will benefit some and hurt others.

I say, who cares? 

We already have Socialism for corporations and investment banks. After all, when was the last time you saw an individual go bankrupt and the government swoop in to pay all their bills? We spend hundreds of billions of dollars to blow people up in Ukraine and the Middle East. Should I be more angry at people who want to receive food, housing, and health care on the government’s dime?

The entire political narrative on both sides is oxymoronic.

That said, I’ve been around long enough to see that, beyond the local level, politics is a

F.A.T.E.-based psyop.

Elections come around, and we choose one candidate mainly because we Fear the opposing candidate’s policies. That fear was primarily generated by media talking heads to whom we assigned Authority over our worldviews.

The authority that determined our worldview also defined our Tribe. No one from the conservative tribe would dare agree with anything from the opposing Leftist tribe and vice versa, lest they risk being ostracized and put out of the proverbial camp.

Finally, the flood of images depicting ignorance, lawlessness, and terror generated by polarizing media narratives keeps our amygdalas fully engaged in Emotion. Our prefrontal cortices are held at bay while we brainwash ourselves by dog-whistling or virtue-signaling media talking points to each other, thus confirming our participation and place as Large Language Models in skin bags within a tribal consensus.

Yeah, I know that’s a mouthful.

Listen

There are no socioeconomic or political solutions to a spiritual problem. No conservative republican capitalist candidate or organization, no Leftist philosophy or system, is going to save the day. No amount of Jesus sprinkled on the world is going to transform Satan’s kingdom into heaven any more than sugar sprinkled on a turd will turn it into a cookie.

Satan’s kingdom will not be transformed on earth. It will only be replaced by the author and finisher of our faith. Even so, I accept that people around me on the left and the right will try and try and try again until they reach the inevitable conclusion that there is nothing new under the sun.

What gain has the worker from his toil? I have seen the business that God has given to the children of man to be busy with. He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end. I perceived that there is nothing better for them than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live… Ecclesiastes 3:9-12

What Time Is It?

Here is the end of the matter.

Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil. Ecclesiastes 12:13-14

Maranatha!

False Equivalency

Stephen and Charlie Kirk

One of our goals in studying Acts is to understand and compare the very first church to the church today. Are we the church in Philadelphia, or Laodicea? Rev 3:7-13, Rev 3:14-22 Philadelphia is the true church. Laodicea is the worldly church. False equivalency is one path into worldliness that produces a Laodicean church.

“‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. For you say, “I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing,” not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. 

Revelation 3:15-18

A False Equivalency is a logical fallacy where two things are inaccurately framed as being the same based on shared characteristics while ignoring major differences. The easiest example is saying apples and oranges are the same because they are both fruit. False equivalency is a popular tool that politicians and the media employ to manipulate public opinion.

As Acts 6 opens, we see the newly formed New Testament church growing rapidly. The Apostles realized they could not meet all the material needs of the people and also be devoted to prayer and preaching the gospel. So they appointed Stephen and six other men to fulfill the role of what would later be called deacons in 1 Timothy 3:8-13.

Deacondiákonos One who executes the commands of another, esp. of a master, a servant, attendant, minister. The servant of a king. One who, by virtue of the office assigned to him by the church, cares for the poor and has charge of and distributes the money collected for their use. A waiter, one who serves food and drink.

– Strongs Concordance-

Stephen was full of grace and power, doing great wonders and signs among the people. He was both anointed and brilliant. Surely anyone with the same ability to articulate truth so accurately and concisely today would have a celebrity platform and a large following.

Yet Stephen was chosen to wait tables.

“The Freedmen” (Libertines KJV) who contended with Stephen were former slaves from various regions of North Africa, Egypt, and Asia. They could not coherently rebut Stephen’s exegetical declarations. So they lied and devised a plan to turn public opinion against him. They accused him of blasphemy against Moses and God.

But they could not withstand the wisdom and the Spirit with which he was speaking. Then they secretly instigated men who said, “We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses and God.” And they stirred up the people and the elders and the scribes, and they came upon him and seized him and brought him before the council, and they set up false witnesses who said, “This man never ceases to speak words against this holy place and the law, for we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and will change the customs that Moses delivered to us.”

Acts 6:10-14

Falsehood can never refute truth. It can only seek to silence the vessel through which it comes. Most recently, we’ve seen this in character assassination, cancel culture, riots, and, literal assassination. Are the human vessels through whom truth comes ever perfect themselves? Certainly not! That doesn’t make the truth they proclaim any less true. Paul clarified this in Romans. It remains true for all of us today.

What if some were unfaithful? Does their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God? By no means! Let God be true though every one were a liar…

Romans 3:3-4

Simply put, if I proclaim Jesus is Lord of all creation one day and murder my neighbor the next, Jesus is still Lord. A common false equivalency embraced by unbelievers today would be to reject Jesus because one who had proclaimed Jesus then committed murder. Christians are prone to the same error, e.g., a transsexual committed a mass shooting in Tennessee, therefore all transsexuals are mass murderers. In both cases, the implied, albeit unconscious, false equivalency is that eliminating Christians and transsexuals will eliminate murder.

Many outside conservative Christian circles are critical of Charlie Kirk’s politics and economic philosophy. The false equivalency begins with their equating his political views with his character. I never met the man. And while I may disagree with his unbiblical view of history, he was, as far as I know, a man of integrity.  I can hear the patriot rebuttal as I write. Whoa Brian! What do you mean by “unbiblical view of history”?!

Thanks for asking.

Like many politically conservative Christians, Charlie Kirk believed that America is a Christian nation because its founders were Christian and founded on Biblical principles. This is in itself a false equivalency. For example, Thomas Jefferson, who stated that our form of government is only fit for a moral and religious people, also used a razor blade to cut out every reference to the supernatural from his Bible. Benjamin Franklin was a Deist. The entire architecture and landscape of Washington DC is rooted in Freemasonry. While the Biblical principles injected into our Constitution and Juris Prudence remain true, it does not make the USA righteous or Christian any more than the Freemason architecture in Washington DC makes America Freemason.

The history of every nation is always a story of conflict between so-called good and evil according to human standards gleaned from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Genesis 3  When the gunfire ceases and the smoke of battle clears, the winner is declared righteous. History is subsequently written and taught to a respective nation’s populace from the perspective of the winner. 

Paul addresses the biblical example of this false equivalency in his dissertation regarding the moral state of mankind. He addresses the Jews who believed they were righteous by birth. Romans 1-3 lays the foundation for the case that apart from Jesus, both Jews and Gentiles are exactly the same.

What then? Are we Jews any better off?  No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks (Gentiles) are under sin, as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.” “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.” “Their feet are swift to shed blood; in their paths are ruin and misery, and the way of peace they have not known.” “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

Romans 3:9-18

Charlie Kirk used scripture to support his political activism. The scripture he shared remains true as ever. But scripture can not sanctify politics any more than it can sanctify sin. Scripture counters sin by replacing the lie with truth.

Choose your preferred media narratives surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk.  At the end of the day, we can not, and probably will never be certain why and who killed him. What we do know is that, like the Jews who killed Stephen, Kirk’s killers could not refute his assertions and concluded the only right choice was to kill him. Whether they were transgender leftists or Israeli Mossad or representatives of an unnamed agenda matters little. They were and are of their father. 

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

John 8:44

And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

Acts 7:59

The underlying dynamic of the fear of truth remains the same. Truth is truth. Truth is only affirmed and supported by questioning.

Jesus contrasted how truth and those of the truth manifest themselves with those of the father of lies. There is no deviation. It doesn’t matter what church you attend or don’t attend. It doesn’t matter what side of the political aisle you prefer. If murder and mayhem are your solution, then you are of the devil.

So Jesus again said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. All who came before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture. The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. He who is a hired hand and not a shepherd, who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees, and the wolf snatches them and scatters them. He flees because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep. I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep. And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd. For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father.”

John 10:7-18

As Christians, we are to proclaim and seek to live according to the gospel and the example Jesus set. That example may include our death. It does not include taking the lives of others. We can only do this by abiding in Jesus.

Stephen is a model of that abiding.

No one seems to know anything about Stephen before Acts 6. That doesn’t matter much because the grace and power with which he was filled came from the same Holy Spirit that filled Peter and all those in the upper room in Acts 2. The same applies to us today. Our scarlet sins are now white as snow. All that matters now is Christ in me, the hope of glory. Col 1:24-29 There is a fine, but very important line between the message of Stephen and that of Charlie Kirk.

Once again, Charlie Kirk debated moral and political issues based on a Christian worldview as defined and supported by scripture. This apologetic approach is only valid in the context of an audience that shares the same worldview underpinned by the same presuppositions regarding moral truth. Kirk argued with those who shared a different worldview and definition of right and wrong. It is pointless to argue against issues like abortion or gay marriage with those who dispute the existence of objective moral law. Apart from God, right and wrong are completely subjective. The definition and value of life are subjective. The definition of a man and a woman is subjective. We must understand that all worldviews are rooted in one or more empirically unprovable presuppositions otherwise known as faith, the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Heb 11:1 Believers understand that faith in the cross of Jesus is the source of our understanding and power. Meanwhile, unbelievers regard this as foolishness. 1 Cor 1:18

If a wise man has an argument with a fool, the fool only rages and laughs, and there is no quiet.

Proverbs 29:9

In Acts chapter 7 Stephen is brought before the High Priest to answer the charge of blasphemy. 

And the high priest said, “Are these things so?”

Stephen replies with the most concise presentation of Israel’s history with God found in scripture. Note that he begins by addressing them with the utmost love and respect.

Brothers and fathers, hear me.

Like the rest of the disciples, Stephen’s purpose is not to change political policy but to bring them to repentance and salvation in Jesus Christ. Most of his sermon is a summarization of history. He concludes with quotes from Isaiah 66:1-2, and Exodus 32:9.

“You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you. Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who announced beforehand the coming of the Righteous One, whom you have now betrayed and murdered, you who received the law as delivered by angels and did not keep it.”

Acts 7:51-53

Stephen presented the truth to Jewish leaders in the context of their shared history and worldview. It was in this context that he presented the error that they had murdered their long-awaited Messiah. They could have repented. Instead,

they cast him out of the city and stoned him. 

Acts 7:58

Stephen was laser-focused on defending the truth of Jesus and His kingdom that is not of this world. He did not venture into politics, social issues, or economics.

Shouldn’t we do the same?

You’d think the church would get it by now. The same Kingdom versus world dynamic keeps repeating. Jesus was tortured and slain by the Romans. The Jewish leaders and many of their followers consented to the crucifixion of Jesus, as evidenced by the consensus that Barabbas should be spared instead of Jesus. Mat 27:15-26 They lied and framed Jesus as the Zealot revolutionary and threat to Caesar. The error and danger here is to create a false equivalency between the group of lying Jews who chose Barabbas and all Jews then and thereafter.

It is important to always keep in mind that we do not war against flesh and blood. Ephesians 6 Wherever we see human beings operating in accordance with a false equivalency be sure you are witnessing the enemy at work. The devil rallies people into groups like football teams then sits back and watches while they persecute and kill one another. Meanwhile, the path to salvation begins with understanding that no one is right. No person or group, no political party or country is right. Only God is right. We are made right by His grace and the love with which He loves us. Ephesians 2:1-10

It occurs to me as I write that in addition to questioning leftist ideology, Charlie Kirk also began to question the narratives following the October 7th Al Asqa massacre and subsequent decimation of Gaza. He did so based on the same objective moral truth defined in the Bible and the presupposition that Truth is never threatened by questions. Rather it is confirmed. After all, Israel has had evil leaders. Ahab and Jezebel are two well-known examples. I am not saying that Bibi Netanyahu and his government are evil. What I am saying is that Charlie Kirk posed several worthwhile questions that have yet to be answered. The false equivalency drawn by many conservative Christians is that anything and everything Israel does today is inherently good and right in God’s eyes simply because it is Israel. The implication that those currently living in the Holy Land, and its current secular government called Israel, define Biblical Israel in its entirety is another false equivalency. Israel is composed of 12 Tribes – thirteen if you count Joseph, the majority of whom remain dispersed around the globe. This matters because many have asserted that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. Can you imagine the firestorm that would result if a world driven by media narratives rooted in false equivalencies discovered that some Jewish people were behind the death of Charlie Kirk? The world would turn against Jewish people even more and their persecution would escalate.  Be careful of false equivalencies, especially those that support unforgiveness in any form.

Lest Satan should get an advantage over us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.

2 Corinthians 2:11

We put ourselves at risk anytime we step out of the pure word of God and preach anything other than the gospel of the Kingdom that is not of this world. Another false equivalency is the assumption that Charlie Kirk is a Christian martyr because he was a Christian who shared scripture in support of the Turning Point USA mission. Many are claiming that preaching the gospel was the primary mission of Turning Point. It was not.

Turning Point USA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk. The organization’s mission is to identify, educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government.

TPUSA About Page

The danger here is the further conflation of the gospel of Jesus Christ with Conservative politics. The implied false equivalency is that Jesus is a capitalist and a Republican. Jesus wasn’t a capitalist or a socialist. He is niether Democrat or Republican. He was neither for nor against any earthly “ist” or “ism”.

His only desire was that all men be saved.

Stephen was the first Christian martyr. He set the standard. Countless men and women have been martyred for the same reason, that is preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Christians in places like Nigeria are being martyred as you read. As we will see in the remainder of Acts, the followers of Christ followed Christ. There were no attempts at influencing, let alone changing the political and socio-economic landscape of society.

We are witnessing a gradual progression in the intensity of persecution in Acts. I believe we are witnessing a similar progression in our society today. Now might be the time to ask ourselves,

What hill am I willing to die on? 

Stephen was absolutely certain of the Truth he spoke and died for it. Charlie Kirk did the same. Stephen died preaching the gospel. Charlie Kirk died answering a question related to the 2nd Amendment. Like Jesus, Stephen never debated those who would kill him. He simply declared the truth. He loved them like Jesus. Charlie Kirk’s last words were in reference to a false equivalency, namely that most mass shootings are  committed by white people. His last statement was, “are you inculding gang violence?” Stephen’s last words mirrored those of Jesus toward the least of His brethren,

Many are calling the recent events surrounding Charlie Kirk a revival. Maybe. Still, I see the risk of our falling into heresy and calling it revival.  Once again, I find myself echoing Jeremiah’s words to Hananiah in Jeremiah 28.

“Amen! May the Lord do so; may the Lord make the words that you have prophesied come true… 

Jeremiah 28:6

I suspect the Lord’s answer to those prophets and their followers believing in the greatness of America apart from national repentance and the rejection of the leaven of Herod, the Pharisees, and Sadducees will receive the same response as Hananiah and the false prophets in Jeremiah 13 and Jeremiah 23. Jeremiah lamented in the end, even if he was preserved amidst what came upon Israel. 

One thing seems certain. False equivalency is a primary tool of battle in Satan’s kit. That people today tend to feel more than think concerns me. The future looks like tribulation to me. May the Laodicean church in America repent and become Philadelphia. Lord help me to follow the example set by Jesus and Stephen. 

Maranatha

The featured photo is one I took of Cathy sitting in the exact spot just outside of Jerusalem where Stephen was stoned.